In a world where answers are spoon-fed, is the art of wondering slowly dying?

In the 1999 blockbuster ‘The Matrix’, as Neo sat across from Morpheus, he was asked a question that changed everything: “What is the Matrix?” It wasn’t the answer that sparked Neo’s journey – it was the act of asking, the yearning to know more. That single moment was a reminder of the transformative power of curiosity.

Fast forward to today, we are flooded with information at our fingertips. Got a question? Google it. Don’t even type it; just ask Siri or Alexa. The answer will be delivered in seconds, and before we can even frame a follow-up question, an algorithm has decided what we might want to know next.

Efficient? Yes, definitely. But at what cost?

The thing is, curiosity thrives on mystery, on lingering over questions that don’t have immediate answers. It’s what makes children ask “why” a hundred times a day, a relentless drive to understand the world around them. But in a world where answers are spoon-fed, the art of wondering is slowly dying.

Albert Einstein once said, “I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious.” This wasn’t false humility – it was a declaration of the mindset that led to revolutionary discoveries.

Einstein’s genius lay not in having all the answers, but in asking the right questions: What would it feel like to ride a beam of light? Why does gravity behave the way it does?

Yet, in today’s age of instant answers, we risk losing that kind of curiosity. Why ponder when Google can tell us? Why explore when YouTube has a tutorial? The danger isn’t just that we stop asking questions – it’s that we stop thinking. And that, to me, is a terrifying prospect.

For the first time in human history, we possess the capability to outsource our thinking entirely. Imagine that – everything we need or desire, handed to us without effort, without engaging the very faculty that defines us as a species. Machines can now tell us what to eat, what to wear, where to go, how to fix things, and even what to feel inspired by. Entire industries are being designed to make sure we don’t have to think at all.

What happens to a society that stops thinking? I shudder at the thought. It’s not just the loss of curiosity – it’s the loss of “agency”. Without the mental rigour of questioning and evaluating, we become passive recipients of information, shaped entirely by algorithms and external inputs. We risk turning into mere consumers, unthinking and uncritical, reacting, rather than creating.

Consider this: the moment we stop thinking, we stop innovating. Progress comes not from accepting the status quo but from challenging it, from imagining something better. History has shown us this time and again – every leap forward has come from minds willing to wrestle with difficult questions. If we no longer ask, “What if?” or “Why not?”, we cease to progress.

And it’s not just innovation we lose. It’s our humanity. Thinking is what makes us uniquely human. It’s the basis of empathy, morality, and decision-making. If we surrender our ability to think deeply, to reflect and reason, then what separates us from machines? Worse still, what happens when those machines, designed to think for us, begin to dictate our lives entirely?

I don’t know about you, but I’m scared of that prospect. Not because technology is inherently bad, but because our over-reliance on it is leading us down a path where our most human trait – our capacity for thought – may become obsolete. And if that happens, what will remain of us?

You see, every major breakthrough in human history began not with an answer but with a question. What lies beyond our galaxy? How can we harness and transport electricity? What causes diseases, and how can we stop them? These questions weren’t solved by quick searches or pre-programmed algorithms – they required years of exploration, failure, and perseverance.

Even today, the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) lies not in its ability to churn out answers but in our ability to ask the right questions. Tools like ChatGPT, MidJourney, or any machine learning algorithm for that matter are only as good as the prompts they receive. In that sense, AI is less a fountain of knowledge and more a mirror of human curiosity.

In conclusion, let’s imagine a world where we stopped chasing instant answers and started asking better questions. Where the goal wasn’t to be the fastest Googler but the most thoughtful inquirer. Where technology wasn’t a crutch but a tool to deepen our wonder.

Neo’s journey in ‘The Matrix’ wasn’t about finding answers – it was about discovering the power of questioning. Let us remember that. As Einstein warned, “The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing.”

So, the next time you have a question, pause. Don’t rush to Google or AI. Sit with it. Explore it. Let it grow into something bigger. Because the future doesn’t belong to those who have all the answers. It belongs to those who dare to ask the right questions.

--

Dr Nahrizul Adib Kadri is an associate professor of biomedical engineering and the Principal of Ibnu Sina Residential College, Universiti Malaya.

The views expressed here are the personal opinion of the writer and do not necessarily represent that of Twentytwo13.