A Perpetual Thorn In Their Sides, Dems Will Miss Joe Manchin For This One Virtue

This article is part of HuffPost’s biweekly politics newsletter. Click here to subscribe.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) announced on Thursday he isn’t running for reelection, and I don’t imagine there are many progressives shedding tears about it.

Manchin is the most conservative Democrat in the Senate by most reckonings, and it’s not an especially close call. He’s been giving grief to party leaders and undermining liberal causes ever since he first ran for that office, way back in 2010.

Manchin was West Virginia’s governor at that time, and Democrats had spent much of the previous two years trying to pass a bill that would limit carbon emissions through what’s known as a “cap and trade” system. The Democrats didn’t succeed, because Senate leaders couldn’t round up the votes they needed to pass legislation that had gotten through the House.

West Virginia is famous for its coal industry, and Manchin wanted voters to know they could count on him to keep blocking such measures if they put him in the Senate. He also wanted to assure them of his strong feelings on the Second Amendment, which is a pretty big deal to those voters too.

His solution: a television ad in which he pulled out a shotgun and fired a bullet through a stack of papers that said “Cap and Trade Bill.”

Manchin won that race. And in the 13 years since, he’s gone against progressives and party leaders just as frequently as he promised he would. That includes the time in 2021 he more or less single-handedly killed what President Joe Biden and Democratic leaders had been calling the “Build Back Better” bill.

The multitrillion-dollar package promised to reduce child poverty, to revolutionize caregiving, to bring down health care costs and to launch a transition to clean energy. Biden and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) had painstakingly negotiated with Manchin, over the course of months, and believed they were close to a deal — only to have Manchin announce at the last minute that he was done and voting no, because the package was too expensive.

It was one of the most dismal days of Biden’s tenure.

So Democratic leaders have plenty of reason to curse Manchin, as do the party’s progressives. And if he runs a third-party presidential bid that takes votes away from Biden, as Manchin has hinted he might do, they will have even more reason to hate him.

But for now, at least, Biden and his allies should be thanking Manchin too — because for all of the heartache, for all of the times he thwarted their plans, they almost surely would have accomplished far less over the past two years if he hadn’t been around.

When it comes to Manchin, the single most important thing to remember is that he represents West Virginia, a state that has voted Republican in every single presidential election since 2000 and chose Donald Trump over Biden in 2020 by 39 points. It was Trump’s second biggest margin of victory in the entire country.

Manchin has won statewide elections there because he talks, acts and votes more like a conservative. That record could reflect his deeply held values, or his determination to give constituents what they want, or some combination of the two. It doesn’t really matter. It has kept him in office and for Democrats, that’s a win, because the alternative to Manchin almost certainly wasn’t a more progressive Democrat. It was a Republican.

Just think how differently the Biden presidency would have played out if, instead of Manchin, a Republican were in that seat from West Virginia. Even if it was a relatively moderate member of the party like Manchin’s West Virginia counterpart, Shelley Moore Capito, Republicans would have been in charge of the Senate in 2021 and 2022. They could have — and almost surely would have — blocked most of Biden’s legislative agenda, and many of his appointments too.

Forget Build Back Better. There would have been no Inflation Reduction Act, either. And remember what’s in that bill: substantial versions of two Build Back Better initiatives, the green energy investments and prescription drug price reductions, that Manchin ended up supporting.

There’s more. The American Rescue Plan, which provided critical relief during the pandemic and which Manchin also supported in the end, would likely have been smaller if Republicans had controlled the Senate back in 2021. And that’s if it passed at all. The federal courts would look a lot different, too, because the Senate wouldn’t have been confirming all of those Biden appointments over the past few years ― again, with Manchin’s vote.

And it’s not just major episodes of Biden’s presidency that might have turned out differently.

During the Trump presidency, Manchin stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Democrats who opposed repeal of the Affordable Care Act. Had he wavered, it could have changed the political dynamics and, ultimately, made it possible for Republicans to pass legislation even with former Sen. John McCain famously voting no.

There are, of course, senators whom Democratic leaders and progressives have much better grounds for resenting. Arizona’s Kyrsten Sinema (who’s now an independent) comes quickly to mind, for her pivotal role killing some tax hikes on the wealthy and more aggressive drug pricing measures. Neither position was politically necessary for her survival. (Just ask her Arizona counterpart Mark Kelly, who won reelection after supporting both.)

It’s a totally different story for Manchin. Democrats were lucky to have a Democrat in that seat for as long as they did. And if that wasn’t clear before, it will be next year when — as seems likely — a Republican has replaced him.