Notes on DeepSeek: Generative AI is All About the Applications Now

I want to try to cut through some of the noise that’s circulating on the rise of DeepSeek R1, the new open source AI model from China. We’re going to see so much writing about the model, its origins, and its creators’ intent over the next few days. But no detail will be more meaningful than how cheap DeepSeek makes running AI models.

Infrastructure spending, until this point, has buoyed the entire AI industry. Tech companies spent billions of dollars on data centers and compute, and promised hundreds of billions more, grounding Wall Street’s expectations of the technology’s potential. OpenAI raised $6.6 billion last year, much of it to be spent on training, giving investors a sense of what it expected in return, and hence what they might expect on the dollars they put in.

But DeepSeek’s emergence changes the equation. The company not only learned how to build a leading AI model with far less up-front investment, its architecture made cutting-edge AI available at a fraction of the cost. DeepSeek today runs at 3-5% of the price of OpenAI’s comparable o1 models. And so developers can now build AI applications at a much lower cost than before.

The focus will therefore soon turn to what you can build with AI vs. how much compute you can assemble to build it. That’s scaring everyone, both because massive infrastructure spending is no longer the benchmark, and because what developers have built with generative AI so far has been slightly underwhelming.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yes, enterprises have used GenAI for real optimizations, and Salesforce has agents now. But take away the billions spent on infrastructure, and just show the AI products themselves, and the multi-trillion-dollar hype hardly feels justified.

The good news is that building with cheaper AI will likely lead to new AI products that previously wouldn’t have existed. It will likely turn expensive enterprise proof of concepts into actual products. And it may give new hope to some working on the wasteland of consumer AI.

The bad news is we still don’t fully know what to do with generative AI. And so the promise that more efficiency will lead to greater usage isn’t a sure thing. We’re also not sure whether the DeepSeek breakthrough will lead to even greater advances in AI technology, or whether it will immediately commoditize the state of the art, creating less incentive to build it. Or perhaps something in the middle.

Even if there’s a lot to be optimistic about today, you can see why people are a bit jittery. Things are about to get real.

This article is from Big Technology, a newsletter by Alex Kantrowitz.

The post Notes on DeepSeek: Generative AI is All About the Applications Now appeared first on TheWrap.