Lawyer: Zahid’s credit card bills paid with cheques that did not feature handwritten signatures

Ida Lim
Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi is pictured at the Kuala Lumpur High Court December 2, 2019. — Picture by Ahmad Zamzahuri

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 2 — Six of the cheques that were used to pay for Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi’s credit card bills did not carry his signature by hand, but could have been signatures stamped on using a stamp, the former minister’s lawyer said today.

Zahid’s lead defence lawyer Hisyam Teh Poh Teik told the court that these were the findings of an expert document examiner at the Department of Chemistry Malaysia who had examined the signatures on these cheques.

Teh had produced the chemist report dated February 28, 2019 and prepared by Siti Nur Musliha Mohamad Noor, where the expert found the signatures in a series of cheques including the six cheques had “similar characteristics as stamp impressions” and made the opinion that they were produced using a stamp.

In the report, the expert gave the opinion that these signatures “could have been made using the same source of stamp” due to them matching each other in terms of “design, size, alignment and spacing”.

The expert further noted in the report however that the stamp impression signatures in question showed some similarities with the handwriting characteristics as a specimen signature.

“As such and due to the nature of the questioned signatures being produced using a stamp and not handwritten signatures, I was not able to form an opinion on the authorship of these questioned signatures,” the expert had said in the report presented by Teh to the court.

Teh then questioned Maybank vice-president Anoop Singh Gulzara Singh about the chemist report’s findings on the six cheques that were used to pay for Zahid’s credit card bills, suggesting that Zahid could not have stamped his own signatures on these cheques.

Teh: With the benefit of this document, I’m suggesting that your cardholder Ahmad Zahid did not stamp these six cheques and made payment to you.

Anoop: I do not know.

Teh: I put it to you also that in fact these six cheques were stamped by his personal assistant at that time, her name is Major Mazlina, you know or do not know?

Anoop: I don’t know.

Teh: I put it to you at this time when these six cheques were stamped, your cardholder had no knowledge that these six cheques were stamped by his personal assistant, you know or do not know?

Anoop: I don’t know.

Teh then asked for the original six cheques to be shown to Anoop who were viewing them for the first time, as well as to High Court judge Collin Lawrence Seqeurah who studied each of these cheques.

The six cheques referred to were for payments of RM1,440, RM2,880, RM5,760, RM5,980, RM7,299.30 and RM7,411.89 to Maybank during the period of February 2014 to October 2014 for Zahid’s Mastercard and Visa card.

The six cheques were part of nine cheques paid to Maybank between February 2014 to July 2015 for Zahid’s MasterCard and Visa card, as well as American Express credit card.

As for one of the nine cheques that were given to Maybank in September 2014 to pay for Zahid’s Visa credit card but was returned, Anoop confirmed that he knew that the cheque was returned as it was unsigned.

Teh then went on to suggest that this could be attributed to Zahid’s then former personal assistant identified only as Major Mazlina where she allegedly made such payment despite the cheque being unsigned, but Anoop said he has no knowledge of this.

Teh also suggested to Anoop that Zahid had his own money to pay for his credit card bills.

Teh: I put it to you that at all material times, your cardholder Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid has the ability to settle all your statements from February 4, 2014 to July 26, 2015 using his personal funds,  you know or do not know?

Anoop: I do not know.

Maybank vice-president in charge of the credit card fraud and dispute management department Anoop Singh Gulzara Singh is seen at the Kuala Lumpur High Court December 2, 2019. — Picture by Ahmad Zamzahuri

Anoop, who is head of Maybank’s credit card fraud and dispute management, earlier today also verified credit card statements for Zahid’s credit cards in the 2014 to 2015 period.

He also verified a credit card statement that showed RM5,900 of Zahid’s Visa card was used at the KLCC outlet of high-end fashion label Louis Vuitton on June 22, 2014.

He verified that Zahid’s Visa card was used on August 4, 2014 for a total of RM7,604.90 in Kiev, Ukraine namely involving 16,666 UAH at Shop Beaumond, 6,655 UAH at Cerutti, 5,295.20 UAH at Atelier de Courcelle.

Anoop confirmed that Zahid’s credit cards were used on 22 May, 2015 for RM30,635.80 in Seoul, Korea involving two retail transactions and one at a supermarket, as well as on 22 May, 2015 for RM1,810.66 at the Lotte Department Store in Seoul, Korea.

In this trial, Zahid is facing 47 charges of criminal breach of trust involving millions of funds from charity foundation Yayasan Akalbudi, as well as bribery and money-laundering in relation to millions of ringgit.

The trial before High Court judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah resumes tomorrow morning.


Related Articles How RM1.4m ended up on Zahid, wife’s credit cards over two years Witness: Zahid, wife's credit cards used for LV, Harrods and Armani, had RM250,000 spending limit Zahid warns disloyal BN ‘reptiles’ of action if they hop