Washington should take more aggressive “grey-zone” strategies – warfare just short of armed conflict - to tackle China and Russia, according to a group of US military strategists including former defence chief Chuck Hagel.
In recommendations published by US think tank the Atlantic Council last month, the strategists said China and Russia had conducted unconventional offensives against the US, including online cyberattacks, and misinformation and disinformation campaigns.
As a result, the US military must “defend more aggressively and take offensive actions in the grey zone”, especially in the areas like information, intelligence and cyberspace, they said.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
Moreover, such hybrid warfare must involve not just the military but all of the government, including the country’s diplomatic, economic, financial and developmental wings.
The think tank’s suggestion comes as the administration of US President Joe Biden readies to release its national security and defence strategies in the coming weeks.
The new strategies are expected to again identify China and Russia as the key threats that “put at risk US global power and prestige” and identify ways to counter them.
The report by the Atlantic Council’s Clementine Starling, Air Force Lieutenant Colonel. Tyson Wetzel, Christian Trotti and former defence secretary Hagel called for the United States, with allies and partners, to “change the game and reshape the environment in their favour” and force China and Russia to play.
The Pentagon has already taken steps into the grey zone, but with tensions rising, particularly over flashpoints like Taiwan and Ukraine, the move should be more aggressive and offensive, the authors argued.
For example, as part of information warfare, the US could release embarrassing information about competitors such as leadership corruption and crackdowns on civil liberties.
It could also use information to create wedge issues either between the strategic competitors or between either China and Russia and their international partners, between Chinese leaders, or between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Russian oligarchs.
Other suggested measures include establishing international rules and norms for space and cyberspace, developing new alliances, freezing financing, sanctions and cyber operations.
They also said the Department of Defence should prepare guiding principles for hybrid warfare, and Washington should create a whole-of-government hybrid warfare toolkit.
With the competition expected to last for many years or even decades, the strategists said Biden should establish more practical short-term objectives such as “improve the United States’ relative security position vis-à-vis China and Russia”.
While calling for more investment in grey-zone competition, the authors also suggested that fiscal priority be given to “integrated deterrence”, and building a force capable of dominating armed conflict with either strategic competitor now and in the future.
More from South China Morning Post:
This article Into the grey zone: how the US could change the game with China and Russia first appeared on South China Morning Post